openlmis-referencedata-ui

Clone Tools

Stats

Commits this week: 19
Total Committers: 34
Last Commit:
Commits this week: 19

Lines of code count not available

Commit Activity

Commits By Day In Week
52 week commits volume
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by day
Commits By Day In Week
Commits by hour
Commits By Hour In Day
Commit calendar
 

Most active committers (90 days)

loading
loading
  • last updated a few seconds ago
All Commits Reviews
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Friday 07 Dec
2:54 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

Bumped version to 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT

Options
    • -4
    • +4
    /docker-compose.yml
    • -1
    • +1
    /project.properties
1:58 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

5.5.0-RC2 release

Options
    • -4
    • +4
    /docker-compose.yml
    • -1
    • +1
    /project.properties
9:21 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

9:21 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

OLMIS-5799: added waiting for parent state to processing schedule edit modal
OLMIS-5799: added waiting for parent state to processing schedule edit modal
9:20 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

9:20 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

Do we test this?

Do we test this?

Thursday 06 Dec
3:38 pm

Klaudia Pałkowska and Łukasz Lewczyński

3:38 pm

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

OLMIS-5799: added comment on why resolve item was added

Options
    • -0
    • +2
    /src/admin-processing-schedule-edit/admin-processing-schedule-edit.routes.js
3:36 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

OLMIS-5783: Removed ObjectReferenceDataBuilder reference from production code
OLMIS-5783: Removed ObjectReferenceDataBuilder reference from production code
3:35 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

OLMIS-5783: Removed ObjectReferenceDataBuilder reference from production code

Options
    • -5
    • +3
    /src/referencedata-supervisory-node/supervisory-node.js
2:22 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

Could you add some comment that this is a temporary hack?

Could you add some comment that this is a temporary hack?

1:45 pm

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

OLMIS-5799: added waiting for parent state to processing schedule edit modal

Options
    • -1
    • +1
    /src/admin-processing-schedule-edit/admin-processing-schedule-edit.routes.js
12:12 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

9:57 am

Łukasz Lewczyński

Wednesday 05 Dec
3:12 pm

Mateusz Kwiatkowski and Klaudia Pałkowska

2:35 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

OLMIS-5783: Removed redundant module loading

Options
    • -1
    • +0
    /src/admin-supply-line-list/admin-supply-line-list.routes.spec.js
2:25 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

OLMIS-5783: Removed ddescribe

Options
    • -1
    • +1
    /src/admin-supply-line-list/admin-supply-line-list.routes.spec.js
2:23 pm

Nikodem Graczewski

OLMIS-5783: Added unit tests for openlmis.administration.supplyLine state

Options
    • -0
    • +3
    /src/admin-supply-line-list/admin-supply-line-list.module.js
    • -0
    • +147
    /src/admin-supply-line-list/admin-supply-line-list.routes.spec.js
    • -1
    • +1
    /src/admin-supply-line-list/supply-line-list.controller.js
    • -3
    • +8
    /src/referencedata-supervisory-node/supervisory-node-data-builder.spec.js
    • -2
    • +5
    /src/referencedata-supervisory-node/supervisory-node.js
12:04 pm

Łukasz Lewczyński

11:59 am

Nikodem Graczewski

11:00 am

Łukasz Lewczyński

10:59 am

Klaudia Pałkowska , Mateusz Kwiatkowski and Nikodem Graczewski

10:35 am

Łukasz Lewczyński

added

added

10:31 am

Łukasz Lewczyński

10:30 am

Klaudia Pałkowska , Mateusz Kwiatkowski and Nikodem Graczewski

10:29 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

I'm thinking if this should be moved to separate function so we can easily test this....

I'm thinking if this should be moved to separate function so we can easily test this....

10:27 am

Łukasz Lewczyński

OLMIS-5790: Added test to verify that user active flag is set

Options
    • -0
    • +9
    /src/referencedata-user/user.spec.js
10:22 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski , Klaudia Pałkowska and Łukasz Lewczyński

10:21 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

do we test this?

do we test this?

10:21 am

Mateusz Kwiatkowski

Can we also check message here or there is no point in doing that?

Can we also check message here or there is no point in doing that?