openlmis-referencedata

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
Bumped Referencedata version to 12.0.1-SNAPSHOT

Released Referencedata service version 12.0.0

OLMIS-5467: Updated service base version to 4

OLMIS-5467: Updated docker compose files
OLMIS-5467: Updated docker compose files
Revert "Released referencedata service version 12.0.0-RC2"

This reverts commit bfe03e00ca24ebcc7eaa9f95cea4e0284a4ff340.

Released referencedata service version 12.0.0-RC2

OLMIS-5467: Updated service-base version to 3 in Dockerfile

Revert "Released referencedata v12.0.0-RC1"

This reverts commit 037b5dcb1098179b1208212b6c080529b7b00b8d.

Released referencedata v12.0.0-RC1

OLMIS-4948: removed validation duplicates in processing period update controller

Then we don't need validation after updating processing period, please remove it if possible.

Then we don't need validation after updating processing period, please remove it if possible.

You should add this commit to this review then so reviewers can see those changes.

You should add this commit to this review then so reviewers can see those changes.

Hi Mateusz Kwiatkowski I added this lines of validation above since the error need to be handled(captured) before updating the processing period.

Hi Mateusz Kwiatkowski I added this lines of validation above since the error need to be handled(captured) before updating the processing period.

Yeah i have already added this message and committed in reference-data repository(541d497270d1e6efe17f93606209af6aa2252e1e). Thanks

Yeah i have already added this message and committed in reference-data repository(541d497270d1e6efe17f93606209af6aa2252e1e). Thanks

OLMIS-4948: Updated processing schedule required field message

Added unit tests for RightAssignmentDto

OLMIS-5467: Updated service-base version to 2

I don't get why we are doing this here? I see that a couple of lines below we are doing validation so this is redundant

I don't get why we are doing this here? I see that a couple of lines below we are doing validation so this is redundant

I would say that for user we should say something like processing schedule is required

I would say that for user we should say something like processing schedule is required

OLMIS-5467: Updated dev version

added report role for divo and psupervisor

OLMIS-4948 - Fix Internal Server Error by providing a clear response message
OLMIS-4948 - Fix Internal Server Error by providing a clear response message