referencedata.processing_periods.json

Clone Tools
  • last updated a few seconds ago
Constraints
Constraints: committers
 
Constraints: files
Constraints: dates
OLMIS-4871 Rename performance-data folder to demo-data
OLMIS-4871 Rename performance-data folder to demo-data
OLMIS-4871 Move demo data to TestDataInitializer

* Change demo data strategy from JSON to CSV.

* Add more data, not from Mockaroo, but from UAT2.

* Remove old demo-data files.

* Fix sonar bugs.

    • -322
    • +0
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 80 more files in changeset.
Revert demo data back to JSON strategy

Also, change requisition group FP 1 to use regular Monthly processing schedule (to pass requisition contract tests).

    • -0
    • +322
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 71 more files in changeset.
OLMIS-4871 Move demo data to TestDataInitializer

* Change demo data strategy from JSON to CSV.

* Add more data, not from Mockaroo, but from UAT2.

* Remove old demo-data files.

* Fix sonar bugs.

    • -322
    • +0
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 71 more files in changeset.
Move requisition group to schedule A

So that first requisition is a regular requisition.

    • -32
    • +32
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 1 more file in changeset.
Revert "OLMIS-4871 Move demo data to TestDataInitializer"

This reverts commit 55caa5a79edd5c686a07cd33ad8b8f93fc350b61.

    • -0
    • +322
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 69 more files in changeset.
OLMIS-4871 Move demo data to TestDataInitializer

* Change demo data strategy from JSON to CSV.

* Add more data, not from Mockaroo, but from UAT2.

* Remove old demo-data files.

    • -322
    • +0
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 69 more files in changeset.
OLMIS-4982 Add report-only processing periods demo data

For facilitating testing.

    • -0
    • +96
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
  1. … 2 more files in changeset.
Revert "OLMIS-3265 Add demo data for past processing periods"

This reverts commit 7855678712ffc761e2383a7a07c97f63fb7bc8fb.

    • -224
    • +0
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
OLMIS-3265 Add demo data for past processing periods

Also to help facilitate testing.

    • -0
    • +224
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
OLMIS-3200 Add vaccine demo data with documentation
OLMIS-3200 Add vaccine demo data with documentation
OLMIS-3200 Add new processing periods to demo data

For 2018.

    • -0
    • +84
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
I checked and modified dates

I checked and modified dates

I checked and added missing data in line items

I checked and added missing data in line items

I changed names

I changed names

OLMIS-3148: Update period names

    • -7
    • +14
    ./referencedata.processing_periods.json
Before I changed period for a requisition I checked what periods I get on UI. For both programs I got the same periods so I assigned them.

Before I changed period for a requisition I checked what periods I get on UI. For both programs I got the same periods so I assigned them.

Yes, there are no requisitions that use those periods. Also I edited them because for one program and facility pair there was only one period, those three periods are not used and not visible on UI.

Yes, there are no requisitions that use those periods. Also I edited them because for one program and facility pair there was only one period, those three periods are not used and not visible on UI.

Yes, I was unable to approve this requisition. I got error message from the stockmanagement service that orderable can be only once.

Yes, I was unable to approve this requisition. I got error message from the stockmanagement service that orderable can be only once.

Yup, let me know if I'm needed, otherwise I've taken myself off. Thanks!

Yup, let me know if I'm needed, otherwise I've taken myself off. Thanks!

I reviewed and left a few questions. I do not think we need Josh on this review. I suggest we take off Josh (or please speak up if you have specific things you want him to review for). Chongsun ha...

I reviewed and left a few questions.

I do not think we need Josh on this review. I suggest we take off Josh (or please speak up if you have specific things you want him to review for). Chongsun has mostly been helping us on demo data lately, so Chongsun is a good person to add to demo data reviews instead of me or Josh for the future.